Did she have baby Trig or didn't she have baby Trig, that is the question everyone is wondering about Sarah Palin. Really though, when you think about it, what woman would pretend to be pregnant because her teen daughter was really the one pregnant and she'd want to cover it up? Sure, Bree did it on Desperate Housewives, but that's just fiction right? Well, we have definite (?) proof that Sarah did indeed give birth to Trig.... Photo "Proof" after the jump! These pictures clearly show a very pregnant Sarah Palin. But there's a 'but.' That's really her and she's really pregnant (unless you're of the mindset that she's wearing a pregnancy suit, which seems ridiculous - but again Bree did it FOR TV). The photos were reportedly taken in March of 2008 (Trig was born April 2008) but the time stamp of photos is March 2005 (however, that is the default time stamp on the particular camera usedand Palin doesn't have a three year old), so could actually be March of '08 but the date/time stamp was never reset on the camera. Now, there's another but - Sarah announced her pregnancy on March 6, surprising many people because she didn't even look preggo! And those photos were taken just two weeks later, which clearly show her to be very pregnant. It's all mind-boggling. I'm assuming she is the mother of Trig and what if she's not? Does that change your opinion of her and her ability to run for Vice President? Does it make her less capable because she may (not likely though) have pretended to be pregnant to cover for her daughter? Or do you think the whole thing is BS? Thoughts? [Photos] Related Posts: Proof That Baby Trig Is NOT Sarah Palin's Son?!! More links (like A LOT more) HERE.

Source: FameCrawler